Holacracy-DAO Integration

Conceptual view of how token-aware governance ideas relate to circles and constitutional decision-making in ƒxyz.

This page is governance-concept context, not a literal specification of every live governance mechanic.

The Core Idea

The repo repeatedly frames governance as having two distinct layers:

operational governance through circles, roles, tensions, and meetings
constitutional or protocol governance through broader network-level decision mechanisms

When describing the live product:

use /circles and /governance for the actual routed experience
use this page to explain the conceptual relationship between circle-based governance and token-aware governance ideas

Do not treat older detailed token-locking, phase-by-phase rollout, or treasury-flow prose as current product truth unless it is confirmed elsewhere.

Use these pages for current truth:

It explains why the repo contains both:

Those are not identical systems, but they are part of the same broader governance story.

This page remains useful as conceptual framing. It should not be mistaken for the primary operational guide to the current governance UI.