DAO Integration
How DAO token-based governance integrates with Holacracy in the ƒxyz Network hybrid governance model
DAO Integration in ƒxyz Network
The ƒxyz Network implements a hybrid governance model that combines the operational efficiency of holacracy with the democratic legitimacy of DAO token-based voting. Rather than operating as separate systems, our DAO mechanisms enhance and complement holacracy structures.
Hybrid Governance Overview
Our governance operates on two integrated layers:
Holacracy Layer (Operational)
- Role-based authority: Fast operational decisions through defined roles
- Rapid iteration: No token voting overhead for routine operations
- Clear accountability: Specific roles with defined purposes and domains
- Tension-driven evolution: Organizational structure evolves based on feedback
DAO Layer (Constitutional)
- Token-based voting: Major decisions require community consensus via ƒ(xyz) tokens
- Treasury management: Community controls network resources and funding
- Constitutional changes: Fundamental governance modifications need supermajority
- Network-wide decisions: Changes affecting all participants require DAO approval
Integration Mechanisms
1. Enhanced Role Authority
Roles can be enhanced with token staking to increase decision-making authority:
Example: A DeFi Product Manager with 10,000 ƒ(xyz) tokens staked can approve both product features (base role) and treasury expenditures up to $50,000 (enhanced authority).
2. DAO-Validated Proposals
Major holacracy proposals trigger DAO voting for validation:
- Constitutional changes to holacracy structure
- New circle creation affecting network resources
- Major role authority modifications
- Treasury allocation decisions
3. Token-Weighted Objections
Traditional holacracy objections can be enhanced with token backing for increased weight in resolution processes.
Governance Rights
ƒ(xyz) token holders have:
- Proposal submission and voting rights
- Role nomination and appointment powers
- Treasury and budget approval authority
- Protocol upgrade decision making
- Veto power over certain holacracy decisions
Development Status
Our hybrid governance implementation progresses through phases:
- Foundation ✅ - Basic token infrastructure and governance framework
- Hybrid Integration 🔄 - Connecting holacracy with on-chain mechanisms
- Automation 📋 - Smart contract execution of approved proposals
- Cross-Chain 🔬 - Multi-chain governance coordination
Learn More
- Holacracy Overview: Understanding role-based governance
- Integration Details: Technical implementation of hybrid model
- DAO Interface: Participate in token-based governance
- Constitution: Our governance framework
This hybrid approach leverages the best of both worlds: holacracy’s operational efficiency with DAO’s democratic legitimacy and transparency.
DAO Integration
How DAO token-based governance integrates with Holacracy in the ƒxyz Network hybrid governance model
DAO Integration in ƒxyz Network
The ƒxyz Network implements a hybrid governance model that combines the operational efficiency of holacracy with the democratic legitimacy of DAO token-based voting. Rather than operating as separate systems, our DAO mechanisms enhance and complement holacracy structures.
Hybrid Governance Overview
Our governance operates on two integrated layers:
Holacracy Layer (Operational)
- Role-based authority: Fast operational decisions through defined roles
- Rapid iteration: No token voting overhead for routine operations
- Clear accountability: Specific roles with defined purposes and domains
- Tension-driven evolution: Organizational structure evolves based on feedback
DAO Layer (Constitutional)
- Token-based voting: Major decisions require community consensus via ƒ(xyz) tokens
- Treasury management: Community controls network resources and funding
- Constitutional changes: Fundamental governance modifications need supermajority
- Network-wide decisions: Changes affecting all participants require DAO approval
Integration Mechanisms
1. Enhanced Role Authority
Roles can be enhanced with token staking to increase decision-making authority:
Example: A DeFi Product Manager with 10,000 ƒ(xyz) tokens staked can approve both product features (base role) and treasury expenditures up to $50,000 (enhanced authority).
2. DAO-Validated Proposals
Major holacracy proposals trigger DAO voting for validation:
- Constitutional changes to holacracy structure
- New circle creation affecting network resources
- Major role authority modifications
- Treasury allocation decisions
3. Token-Weighted Objections
Traditional holacracy objections can be enhanced with token backing for increased weight in resolution processes.
Governance Rights
ƒ(xyz) token holders have:
- Proposal submission and voting rights
- Role nomination and appointment powers
- Treasury and budget approval authority
- Protocol upgrade decision making
- Veto power over certain holacracy decisions
Development Status
Our hybrid governance implementation progresses through phases:
- Foundation ✅ - Basic token infrastructure and governance framework
- Hybrid Integration 🔄 - Connecting holacracy with on-chain mechanisms
- Automation 📋 - Smart contract execution of approved proposals
- Cross-Chain 🔬 - Multi-chain governance coordination
Learn More
- Holacracy Overview: Understanding role-based governance
- Integration Details: Technical implementation of hybrid model
- DAO Interface: Participate in token-based governance
- Constitution: Our governance framework
This hybrid approach leverages the best of both worlds: holacracy’s operational efficiency with DAO’s democratic legitimacy and transparency.